Reader Response (Edited)
In the article “3D building
models help bring sustainability into construction”, Jenkins (2015) claims that
Building Information Modelling (BIM) has adverse possibilities in replacing
traditional 2D drawings. BIM creates a three-dimensional (3D) model of the
actual building and runs computer stimulation that is capable of countering
imminent errors and calculations before the construction of a building, which minimizes construction defects
and reduces building cost. This is supported by Sutton (as cited from
Jenkins,2015), who mentioned that the innovation of
BIM has brought the building industry to a new height due to the innovative
approach of calculating design data before the building is physically built.
This process significantly shortens the time of construction as well as
reducing building materials. BIM has become an essential design tool due to the
demand of more complex building and the emphasis of reducing building’s
environmental impact by improving energy efficiency and reducing waste.
However, despite BIM being identified globally as a cost-efficient and
co-ordinated way of enhancing building
construction, it is still not globally used due to several reasons.
One reason is due to the cost
of implementation. In the article, "Traditional design versus BIM based
design,” Czmoch (2014) claims that the primary problem of replacing traditional
design to BIM is due to the high-priced software and hardware. Integration of
BIM in a company requires a huge amount of capital, a single workstation can cost up to a
few thousand dollars (USD) and can be easily summed up to hundreds of thousands
(USD) just for a single design team. In addition, Czmoch (2014) also claims
that designer’s ignorance to the designing tool will result in a great loss in
productivity. With the advance technology of BIM, it is capable to increase the
productivity to meet the increasing demand of more complex designs in modern
buildings. However, to increase the proficiency of the design team, it is
essential for the employers to invest in regular BMI classes conducted by
professionals, which could result in additional cost in implementation. Despite
BIM’s capability of providing a cost-efficient way of building construction, a
substantial amount of capital is required.
Hence many small-scale companies refused to improvise BIM into their companies.
Another reason why BIM is
still not globally used is due to the preference for a traditional work
approach. In the article,” A construction revolution,” Chew (2013) states that
BIM adopts an integrated design approach,
which brings the team of professionals and stakeholders together in the initial
phase of the project and connects the team through the 3D modelling design with
stimulation of the design to identify issues and propose improvements. However,
BIM projects have difficulties in bringing the team together due to the lack of
collaboration within parties and the preference of traditional work concepts
over BIM’s collaborative approach. Traditional work concepts resemble a linear
workflow, where an individual passes their work down the line with minimal
coordination amongst each other. In contrast, BIM adopts integrated design
approach, which ensures all parties work together from the start of the project.
which can be more efficient and most importantly reduce the need for changes in
the later stage. Despite BIM’s capabilities of providing a coordinated way of
building construction, man y experienced parties prefer traditional work
concepts over integrated design approach, due to the unwillingness of sharing
important data.
BIM has the possibility of
replacing traditional 2D drawings with its technology and capabilities.
However, for BIM to be used globally, the cost of the software must be adjusted
to suit the capabilities small-scale companies. The biggest challenge lies on
the preference of traditional work approach for construction which may be
solved through conducting simulation workshop to help industry professionals to
understand the capability of BIM better. Hopefully BIM will be able to replace
the traditional 2D drawings soon, bringing the technology to a greater height.
References:
Allison,
P.R. (2015). How building information modelling is changing the construction
industry. Computer Weekly.
Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
Chew,
A. (2013). Building Information Modeling (BIM): A construction
revolution. Corrs
Chambers Westgarth. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
Czmoch,
I. (2014). Traditional design versus BIM based design. Procedia Engineer,
ScienceDirect. Retrieved September 26, 2017,
from
Jenkins, M.
(2015). 3D building models help bring sustainability into construction.
The Guardian. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
Comments
Post a Comment